Status Of Forces Agreement Guam
The story that is being told mainly concerns U.S. bases on the sovereign soil of other countries. Is the situation in Guam anomale? Is Guams Andersen AFB a national base or a foreign base? Since Guam is a U.S. territory, it is neither a fully incorporated part of the United States nor a free nation. On the island`s license plate, which says, “Where America`s Day begins,” there`s also “Guam USA.” It expresses the desire of some rather than reality. It might be better to read, Guam, an American type of A. However, international legal norms claim status. Guam is a colony and above all a military colony, in accordance with the idea that the imperial history of the United States, especially in the second half of the twentieth century, was military colonialism throughout the world. Nevertheless, pressure came from Australia, France and England, as well as Panama, Denmark and Iceland, to return bases on their own territory or colonies and demobilize the twelve-million-man army on the national territory (it would have taken a larger army to maintain the huge basic system). However, the codification of U.S. military access rights worldwide into a comprehensive set of legal documents was more important than the decrease in the number of bases. These alliances formed security alliances with several countries in Europe (NATO), the Middle East and South Asia (CENTO) and Southeast Asia (SEATO) and included bilateral agreements with Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand. These alliances have taken on a common security interest between the United States and other countries and have been the charter of the American base everywhere.
The Status of Force Agreements (SAAs) was developed in each country to determine what the military could do; These generally gave U.S. soldiers broad immunity from prosecution for crimes committed and environmental damage. These agreements and subsequent basic operations were usually shrouded in secrecy. With the desire to acquire military control of space and gather information, the United States has built over time, especially in the 1990s, a large number of new military bases to facilitate the strategic use of communication and space technologies. . . .